Ok, I couldn’t fit this all into a reasonable title, but this is what I wanted for my title:
“[A-Space is] a place where not only spies can meet but share data they’ve never been able to share before.”
Never did I know (before now) that spies were in the business of sharing. I thought it was about amassing as much intelligence data as possible and deliberately not sharing it with your peers, even if you are working for the same government. Ah well. Shows what I know.
i mean, there is something to be said for the various spooks bouncing analysis off one another and hopefully seeing something new from that synergy. I’m all about the brainstorming. And I’m not a spy (or am I just telling you that to throw you off-track?), but I do see the necessity of people working across organizations for a common cause. However, there are other modes of thought on the analysis of data. Group consensus can keep individuals from picking apart certain ideas they might examine more closely if not shared. Data analysis in consortium can lead to trends that are hard to break out of, rather than spurring dialogue. And how much dialogue is inspiring, versus just plain dissension.
And then, there’s always the matter of the classic double agent. Once you give somebody the clearance to be inside A-Space, what’s to stop them from wreaking havoc? There are supposed to be controls in place to stop this kind of thing, but again, in such a case, who watches the watchers?
On the whole it’s probably a good tech move, and a good way to share resources and get into real data mining that the people in these agencies need. But it’s also fun, and funny to the outside world. To prove my point, I will leave you with a final article quote: “Yes, analysts can collect friends on A-Space the way people can on Facebook. But nobody outside the intelligence community will ever know — because they’re secret.”
Watch out, secret BFF, here I come!